Some rise, some fall, some climb..

augustusarnone | Uncategorized | Friday, April 17th, 2009

Regarding the following, I just can’t think of a more lovely and eloquent metaphor for the artist’s life, maybe Journey of the Magi…

Shadows of a sailor, forming winds both foul and fair all swarm.
Down in carlisle, he loved a lady many years ago.
Here beside him stands a man, a soldier from the looks of him,
Who came through many fights, but lost at love.

While the story teller speaks, a door within the fire creaks;
Suddenly flies open, and a girl is standing there.
Eyes alight, with glowing hair, all that fancy paints as fair,
She takes her fan and throws it, in the lions den.

Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance.
The sailor gave at least a try, the soldier being much too wise,
Strategy was his strength, and not disaster.

The sailor, coming out again, the lady fairly leapt at him.
Thats how it stands today. you decide if he was wise.
The story teller makes no choice. soon you will not hear his voice.
His job is to shed light, and not to master.

Schoenberg is a Gothic Cathedral

augustusarnone | Uncategorized,blatant pontificating | Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

Speaking of the intense chromaticism that characterized melodic sequences in the third movement of his Opus 10 quartet, arguably his first truly atonal movement. Schoenberg describes a unique contrapuntal environment wherein simultaneous individual voices are free to move without consideration of the vertical harmonies that they form.

“Evidently melodic progressions like [these] from the third movement [of Opus 10] cannot be accompanied by tonal triads, and if at all by chords, they would have to be transformed by alterations. Instead, one finds accompanying voices whose purpose is not harmonic at all; they even do not aim for chord production. Their function and derivation might, in the near future, be discovered as its author found them psychologically comforting when he wrote them. (Schoenberg CD 43)”

Interestingly, Schoenberg had evidentally not abandoned the idea that the resultant vertical structures might be construed as a series of functional harmonies, though this consideration was lacking in their composition. It seems to have not occurred to him that he was working within a non-linear medium. Nevertheless, at the same time that he was moving away from reliance on functional harmonic progressions he became ever more concerned with unity and inter-reference between parts, which took the form of continual transformation and reformulation of motives. His own self-admitted aesthetic aim at the time was
“how to create variety out of unity; how to create new forms out of basic material; how much can be achieved by slight modifications, if not by developing variation, out of often rather insignificant little formulations.”
This concern with interrelation would only intensify over the course of his career, taking the form of the inversions and retrogrades in his 12 tone rows, and eventually his combinatorial hexachords.

Heightened emphasis on pattern formation is precisely the result that Mcluhan declares as inevitable following from that dissolution of linear logic brought on by electric media’s ascent and proliferation.

“Our electrically-configured world has forced us to move from the habit of data classification to the mode of pattern recognition. We can no longer build serially, block-by-block, step-by-step, because instant communication insures that all factors of the environment and of experience co-exist in a state of active interplay.”

Mcluhan is emphasizing a dichotomy here between two different modes of psychological organization, one that separates and groups elements into contained areas or concepts (hence classes), and one that apprehends the various elements of a given environment as integrated and interrelated. The earlier quote by Schoenberg belies the fact that he was intuitively wandering, seemingly unawares, away from the habit of classifying his harmonic materials within contained, functional chord structures. When one studies Mcluhan’s extensive research and commentary on the nature of these two modes of thought, it becomes obvious that Schoenberg’s drive towards unity and interreference was intrinsically linked to his abandonment of vertical considerations.

Mcluhan deals with the question of containment as an organizational principle in a discussion of cathedrals during the first several centuries of the second millenium as contrasted with those of the Baroque. Bear in mind that he explains the tendency towards specialized parts rather than integration as an effect of the proliferation of printed media, and so the centuries prior to the Gutenberg press did not exhibit the same perceptual bias. The fact that Gothic cathedrals have more in common with Schoenberg’s or Babbitt’s music than even nineteenth-century cathedrals stems from the overthrowal of print’s visual bias by twentieth-century electric media.

Mcluhan opens this discussion in The Gutenberg Galaxy with the statement: “Scribal Culture and Gothic Culture were both concerned with light through, not light on.(105).” With regard to the Gothic cathedral he’s referring to the use of stained glass and only partial walls to circulate light throughout the whole of the interior, rather than walling it off into separate rooms. In the words of Medieval scholar Otto von Simson:

The Gothic wall seems to be porous: light filters through it, permeating it, merging with it, transfiguring it … Light, which is ordinarily concealed by matter, appears as the active principle; and matter is aesthetically real only insofar as it partakes of, and is defined by, the luminous quality of light.(105)

Thus, in the Gothic cathedral the special objects, activities, and content pertaining to the various areas of the interior were not separated from each other, one did not wander from room to room taking in each specialized space one at a time. Rather, one took in the entire space as a panoramic whole, observing the interplay among the various contents scattered throughout the whole interior. “After Gutenberg,” Mcluhan explains, “the new visual intensity will require light on something. And its idea of space and time will change to regard them as containers to be filled with objects or activities. But in a manuscript age …space was not a visual container.(107) So by “light on” as opposed to “light through” he’s referring to the literal example of the use of light in these spaces, but really he’s talking about principles of apprehension and imagination that separate the age of print’s dominance from the ages before it, and from our own age dominated by electric media. The ramifications of this example can be extraordinarily illuminating when approaching contemporary aesthetics, musical or otherwise.

The Schoenberg example deals specifically with the organization of pitch. It very much demonstrates the principle of light through rather than light on in that groups of pitches are not “walled off” from each other and situated within functional harmonies. A chord itself is a kind of container, an exclusivity if you will – these pitches, not those pitches. His twelve-tone system of composing decimated the notion of pitch exclusivity, and thus of specialized harmonies or key areas, just by virtue of the fact that all the pitches were present all the time. Individual voices were free to infiltrate any part of the pitch spectrum, much like the latticework of light through the gothic cathedral, rather than coming together with the other voices to form specialized pitch content.

Me and JB go back a ways

augustusarnone | Uncategorized | Thursday, May 15th, 2008

Me and Brahms“Johnny…it’s like I always told you, you have to give the people what they want…”

“Any idiot could hear that it sounds like the Hammerklavier.”

“Well, we’ll study it then. In the meantime, I have one word for you…. Plastics”

Die Spammers!

augustusarnone | Uncategorized | Saturday, April 26th, 2008

Those of you who know I used to have a journal will have noticed I have just started from scratch again. I made the fatal error of not installing a security update and then while attempting to delete a spam comment my whole installation got totally screwed up. I think it must be a government conspiracy trying to combat free speech. Well we have Dubya now instead of Tricky Dicky, soon to be replaced by who knows what god-fearing homunculus – but we also got tools now! RSS and Youtube and Linux, oh how that aging fat-cat Gates must anguish over ‘apt-get’ .. Although, with MSN and Yahoo turning their eyes now to web 2.0, and ISPs delegating bandwith priority to ‘preferred’ entities — http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-rintels/big-medias-common-interes_b_98568.html – there is reason to fear.

Anyhow, my journal is back.

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck